On September 27, 2024, the Lokayukta Police in Karnataka officially registered a First Information Report (FIR) against Chief Minister Siddaramaiah regarding the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) site allotment case. This significant development follows the recent direction of a special court in Bengaluru, which ordered an inquiry into allegations that Siddaramaiah’s wife Parvathy illegally acquired 14 sites worth ₹56 crore from MUDA.
The special court, which focuses on criminal cases involving former and elected MPs/legislators, directed the Lokayukta police in Mysore to investigate a complaint filed by RTI activist Snehamayi Krishna[1][8]. The court emphasized the importance of a thorough investigation into the allegations, directing the Superintendent of Police of the Karnataka Lokayukta in Mysore to register the case and ensure that a comprehensive investigation is conducted within the stipulated time frame of three months.
The FIR outlines various serious charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Benami Property Transactions Act, and the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act.
Despite the serious nature of the allegations, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah remains steadfast, insisting that he will not resign from his post[1]. Calling the FIR a politically motivated action, he maintains that he has not done anything wrong and questions the rationale behind the demand for his resignation.
The registration of this FIR marks a critical moment in Karnataka’s political landscape, raising questions on the integrity of leadership and governance[1]. Siddaramaiah’s administration now faces heightened scrutiny as the probe unfolds, potentially affecting public perception and political dynamics in the state.
The BJP has condemned the decision by the Congress-led government to withdraw the general consent given to the CBI for investigation in the state, calling it a desperate attempt to shirk responsibility.
This development underscores the ongoing challenges regarding transparency and accountability in Karnataka’s political structure[1]. The case will serve as a litmus test for the state’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and addressing corruption within its ranks.